More Money Now Could Embed Education Deficiencies Into the Future

The Governor is right that education is the key to the state’s economic growth. But, the Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education cannot support his education spending plan at this time.

[Editor's note: The following blog post is by Linda Noonan, executive director of the Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education.]

When you want to modernize a 150-year-old property you stabilize the foundation long before you start planning how to add a third floor. Cliché as it might seem to say, the same should go for education reform.

Governor Deval Patrick has been barnstorming the state building momentum for more money for education as part of his ambitious 2013-14-budget plan. The Governor, Secretary of Education Malone and the entire administration should be applauded.

Proposing that the state pay more attention to the need to start educating students as young as 4 years old, to accelerate improvements at underperforming schools, to better aligning community college degrees with the jobs that are actually available in the marketplace are all valuable ideas.

Regrettably, pouring more money on a fundamentally antiquated system is not the right answer. 

Even a cursory examination leads to the conclusion that we are not getting the best bang for our education buck based on what we are already investing in.

The state’s “foundation” budget (aka Chapter 70) was established two decades ago. The mere fact there is a widely acknowledged achievement gap in our schools is evidence that the formula used to establish the foundation could, at the least, benefit from determining if the assumptions it is based on are still relevant.

A lot has changed in education in the past 20 years. Significant advances in technology and cognitive science have altered our ability to be more effective teachers and learners. What would happen if more of our existing funds were pointed in the direction of what we have learned rather than being used to prop up a system that has not structurally changed since it was designed to educate farmers and factory workers?

We should only be talking about increasing funding when we can eliminate what is broken in the current system and target where the new money does the most good. Anything less is a disservice to our students, our economy and the taxpayers of our Commonwealth. Doing so, would be a heck of a legacy for all of us. 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Janet Sroczynski March 28, 2013 at 04:56 PM
@MO - "Rock the Schoolhouse" article: National Education Standards - A Confidence Game? Boston.com blog posted by Jim Stergios on March 30, 2012 at 4:35pm. Link at: http://boston.com/community/blogs/rock_the_schoolhouse/2012/03/national_education_standards_a.html
MO March 28, 2013 at 05:52 PM
This is a MUST read for everyone! This Common Core experiment on our children is unconstitutional and ILLEGAL. Thank you Janet.
MO March 28, 2013 at 06:27 PM
In our report, The Road to a National Curriculum, Kent Talbert and Bob Eitel summarize how Arne Duncan’s US DOE used Gates money and DC trade groups to circumvent federal laws that prohibit national standards: The Department has simply paid others to do that which it is forbidden to do. This tactic should not inoculate the Department against the curriculum prohibitions imposed by Congress.
MO March 28, 2013 at 08:28 PM
Scary Stuff... "Sensors provide constant, parallel streams of data and are used with data mining techniques and self-report measures to examine frustration, motivation/flow, confidence, boredom, and fatigue. The MIT Media Lab Mood Meter (Hernandez, Hoque, & Picard, n.d.) is a device that can be used to detect emotion (smiles) among groups. The Mood Meter includes a camera and a laptop. The camera captures facial expressions, and software on the laptop extracts geometric properties on faces (like distance between corner lips and eyes) to provide a smile intensity score" http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/technology/files/2013/02/OET-Draft-Grit-Report-2-17-13.pdf
Michael Quinlan March 28, 2013 at 09:14 PM
You'll be heading to the gulag, alas.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »